Review on the Cascading Effects of Climate Change on Expansion of Livestock Disease Livestock Production and Mitigation
Asledin Mohammed
Veterinary clinic and Agricultural Office of kumbi District, East Hararghe Zone, Ethiopia
Submission:February 15, 2024;Published:February 23, 2024
*Corresponding author: Asledin Mohammed, Veterinary clinic and Agricultural Office of kumbi District, East Hararghe Zone, Ethiopia,Email: drasledin2023@gmail.com
How to cite this article: Asledin M. Review on the Cascading Effects of Climate Change on Expansion of Livestock Disease Livestock Production and Mitigation. Dairy and Vet Sci J. 2024; 16(3): 555938.DOI: 10.19080/JDVS.2024.16.555938
Abstract
This study explores the perceived influence of climate change on the health of Hamer pastoralists and their livestock in south-western Ethiopia. A combination of focus group discussions and key informant interviews were conducted with Hamer communities as well as local health workers, animal health workers and non-governmental organization (NGO) staff. Thematic framework analysis was used to analyze the data. Reductions in range land, erratic rainfall, recurrent droughts, and loss of seasonality were perceived to be the biggest climate challenges influencing the health and livelihoods of the Hamer. Communities were travelling greater distances to access sufficient grazing lands, and this was leading to livestock deaths and increases in ethnic violence. Reductions in suitable range land were also precipitating disease outbreaks in animals due to increased mixing of different herds. Negative health impacts in the community stemmed indirectly from decreases in livestock production, uncertain crop harvests and increased water scarcity. The remoteness of grazing lands has resulted in decreased availability of animal milk, contributing to malnutrition in vulnerable groups, including children. Water scarcity in the region has led to utilization of unsafe water sources resulting in diarrheal illnesses. Further, seasonal shifts in climate-sensitive diseases such as malaria were also acknowledged. Poorly resourced healthcare facilities with limited accessibility combined with an absence of health education has amplified the community’s vulnerability to health challenges. The resilience and ambition for livelihood diversification amongst the Hamer was evident. The introduction of camels, increase in permanent settlements and new commercial ideas were transforming their livelihood strategies. However, the Hamer lack a voice to express their perspectives, challenges, and ambitions. 4There needs to be collaborative dynamic dialogue between pastoral communities and the policymakers to drive sustainable development in the area without compromising the values, traditions, and knowledge of the pastoralists.
Keywords:Climate change; livestock production; Animal diseases; livestock health; Expansion; and Impact.
Introduction
Climate change is a result of the global increase in average air and ocean temperatures, and rising average sea levels and has become the main issue affecting global and regional natural eco-systems (IPCC, 2007). The world’s climate was reported to be warming at a faster rate than ever before (IPCCijisrt@gmail.com ijisrt@gmail.com, 2007), with concomitant changes in precipitation, flooding, winds, and the frequency of extreme events such as El Niño. The average temperature in the world has increased in the last few years compared to the previous century and is expected to continue rising if measures are not taken particularly by highly industrialized countries to reduce greenhouse gases emissions (IAEA, 2017). Though Changes in climate and extreme weather events have received increased attention in the recent years, climate change is real and is happening now. It will become worse in future with more impacts to rural poor communities of developing countries (Kimaro and Chibinga, 2013) [1].
Agriculture and livestock are amongst the most climate sensitive economic sectors in the developing countries. Livestock production and health are significantly vulnerable to the impact of climate change (Kimaro and Chibinga, 2013). Climate change has negative effects on livestock health in many aspects and can exacerbate disease in livestock and some diseases are especially sensitive to climate change (Nejash and Kula, 2016; Shahen et al., 2019). Based on IPCC (2007) report, global changes in temperature may affect the incidence and range of several infectious diseases within endemic areas and their introduction to free areas (Hansen et al., 2005). Approximately 80% of emerging infectious diseases affecting humans and a rising number of these diseases (example severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), monkey pox, Marburg diseases and Ebola) are spread by contact with wildlife. A report by IAEA (2017) indicated that the most important immediate consequences of global warming would be an increased incidence in deadly infectious diseases in wildlife, livestock, and people. These emerging diseases can have serious consequences for public health, the economy, and species conservation (Md et al., 2014). For instance, SARS alone has killed over 700 people and has cost the global economy US$ 50 billion. When such diseases appear and spread unabated, confidence in the structure of civil society designed to protect life and conserve natural resources will be eroded (Li et al., 2005). Vector borne diseases are particularly affected by weather patterns and long-term climatic factors strongly influence the incidence of outbreaks (Rahman et al., 2019). Most of these diseases are caused by insects and their population dynamics is dependent on the prevailing weather conditions, specifically temperature and humidity (IAEA, 2017). Because arthropods are highly sensitive to environmental and seasonal temperatures, the range of vector-borne diseases such as bluetongue, west Nile fever, Venezuelan equine encephalitis, rift valley fever, African horse sickness and visceral leishmaniasis may be limited or exacerbated by the distribution of competent vectors (Purse et al., 2005). The rapid spread of the above-mentioned diseases has been driven by climate change. In addition, animal parasites including tick- borne diseases in Africa and New world screwworm (Cochliomyia hominivorax) in south America had been reported to spread to new regions, causing negative impact on livestock production and causing direct and/or indirect effects on public health (Rappole et al., 2000) [2].
Though the links between animal production and climate change are complex and multi-directional, climate change influences livestock production by affecting the conditions governing animal production, fodder crop production and animal health (Walter et al., 2010). The vulnerability of animal production, warming those animal production facilities will be affected both directly and indirectly by climate change (IPCC, 2007). Although there is an enormous amount of research and scientific deals about climate change, reports regarding the impact of climate change on animal production and animal diseases including the linkage among the three are scarce. Therefore, this seminar review is geared with the objectives of: (i) organizing scientific reports about the impacts that climate change may pose on animal production and animal diseases; (ii) reviewing some concepts and reports, from different scientific deals, about the linkage among climate change, animal production and animal diseases (Abrar et al., 2020) [3].
Climate Change and Animal Diseases
Climate change has had an unprecedented worldwide impact on emerging and re-emerging animal diseases and zoonoses. Climate change is disrupting natural ecosystems by providing more suitable environments for infectious diseases allowing disease-causing bacteria, viruses, and fungi to move into new areas where they may harm wildlife and domestic species, as well as humans. There is evidence that the increasing occurrence of tropical infectious diseases in the mid latitudes is linked to global warming. Climate change influences local weather conditions and therefore, has a significant impact on the presence of insects and their geographical distribution (IAEA, 2003-2017). Climate change has negative effects on livestock health in many aspects. It may influence livestock health through several factors, including the range and abundance of vectors and wildlife reservoirs, the survival of pathogens in the environment. Climate change can exacerbate disease in livestock and some diseases are especially sensitive to climate change. Indeed, a better understanding of the effect of climate change on animal health is crucial and good for recommendations on how to lessen its potential impact (Nejash and Kula, 2016) [4].
Impacts of Climate Change on Animal Diseases
Climate change is expected to affect disease and pest’s distributions, range prevalence, incidence, and seasonality but the degree of change remains highly uncertain. It is expected to affect both pathogen and vector habitat through changes in temperature, precipitation, humidity, and wind patterns. Heat stress and drought are likely to have further negative impacts on animal and human health and disease resistance (IPCC, 2007). It has been reported that animals in the Afar regional state had suffered from the burden of endemic and varieties of newly emerged animal diseases which can be linked to the changing climate and the extreme weather conditions. Cold- blooded vectors are sensitive to direct effects of climate such as temperature, rain fall patterns and wind. Rising temperature influences the production and maturity rate of infective agents as well as the survival rate of the vector organisms, thereby further influencing disease transmission (IPCC, 2007). Climate also affects their distribution and abundance through its effects on host plants and animals.
(Bett et al., 2016). Climate change can have direct and indirect effects on infectious diseases. Direct effects manifest as reduced capacity of the hosts to mount a response to infection (e.g. due to heat stress) or increased development rates of pathogens and vectors. Indirect effects, on the other hand, are associated with climate-driven ecosystem changes or socio-cultural and behavioral adaptations which could also amplify vector/pathogen development or increase vector-pathogen-host contact. The sociocultural and behavioral adaptations include livelihood practices such as increased frequency and range of migration often associated with pastoral communities (Figure 1). Direct pathways include processes that affect host immunity and/or pathogen and vector development dynamics, while indirect processes include processes that destabilize disease ecology, leading to an increase or decrease of contact between vectors, pathogens and hosts, or increased persistence of pathogens in an environment (Bett et al., 2016) [5].
![Click here to view Large Figure 1](images/JDVS.MS.ID.555938.G001.png)
It was described that landscape changes that remove portions of host populations (example habitat alteration or destruction), alteration of host migration patterns (example habitat fragmentation) and increased host density were factors that affect animal diseases emergence and re-emergence. The geographical distribution of vector-borne diseases is influenced by the geographical distribution of both vertebrate host and the distribution of the vector; other contagious diseases are also subject to a degree of environmental influences, including parasite life cycles which can be transmitted by wind-borne aerosol spread (Baylis and Githeko, 2006). Increased precipitation may also cause changes in the prevalence and intensity of parasite infestations, increasing host mortality in wild and domestic species (Daszak et al., 2003) [6].
Impact of climate change on pathogens and hosts
Even though limited work has been done to determine the effects of temperature changes on pathogens, a rise in temperature increases replication rates of pathogens in the vector, therefore shortening their extrinsic incubation period. This suggests that within the limits when the vector survival is ideal, higher temperatures should result in shorter development interval of the virus in the vector, and hence greater chances of the vector living longer to transmit the infection. Temperature also has substantial effects on pathogens that spent part of their life cycles outside a mammalian host such as the agents that cause anthrax, black quarter and dermatophilosis, helminths, etc (Bett et al., 2016). In nature pathogens can be transmitted directly between animals or indirectly through intermediate hosts. Indirect transmission aids are often affected by environmental conditions such as temperature and rain fall. Higher temperatures associated with climate change may contribute to an increase in pathogens with intermediate hosts and vectors or in erased survival of animals that labor disease (Kutz et al., 2005). Survival of some parasites was reported to be increased by warmer temperatures and milder winters in the north central United States and Northern Canada. Climate change would lead animals to be stressed by heat (Lenarz et al., 2009) and as result becoming more susceptible to parasitic and infectious diseases (Murray et al., 2009) [7].
The more contact between wildlife populations and domestic species the higher the likelihood of exposure to novel pathogens, leading to emergence of new diseases in humans and animals. For example, neutralizing anti-bodies against Para-influenza PI-3, a virus which is relatively common in cattle, have been found in Huemui deer in Chile (a species which is in danger extinction). For contagious animal diseases, climate may be associated with seasonal occurrence of diseases rather than with spatial propagation. These is evidence for pathogens or parasitic diseases, such as Fasciolosis, in areas with higher temperatures, when seasonality is extended because of the increased survival of the parasite outside the host or, conversely, shortened by increased summer dryness that decreases their numbers (Baylis and Githeko, 2006) [8].
For other pathogens, such as parasites that spend part of their life cycle as free stages outside the host, temperature and humidity may affect the duration of survival. Climate change could modify the rate of development of parasites, increasing in some cases the number of generations and then extending the temporal and geographical distribution. New world screwworm infestations had been observed to increase in spring and summer and decrease in autumn and winter in South America (Madeira et al., 2005). On the other hand, Leishmaniasis in humans has been associated with the increased frequency of drought as this facilitates reproduction and growth of adult sand flies (Cardenas et al., 2006). Wild birds are known to be reservoirs for several pathogens, including west Nile virus (WNV), and serve as amplifying hosts for the virus in nature (Reed et al., 2003). The migration of birds is driven in part by seasonal climatic factors, and any change in climatic conditions may modify the direction and intensity of spread of disease. Similar disease ecology and wildlife interactions of pathogens associated with birds have been observed for Newcastle diseases, WNV (Bosh et al., 2007, influenza A virus (Reed et al., 2003). The mosquitoes Culex species, for example, Culex pipiens, Culex restuans play an important role as vectors, for WNV. Bluetongue virus, which is transmitted by Culicoides species, midges has been historically distributed between latitudes 40o N and 35o S. Vesiculo viruses which cause vascular stomatitis can be insect-transmitted and has been isolated from species of midges (culicoides species) and hlevotomine flies, including sand flies (Lutzomyta species) and black flies (simuliidae species). An antibody to vesiculovirus has been detected in monkeys, marsupials, bats, carnivores, deer, and rodents throughout America. Seasonal variation is observed in the occurrence of viruses: it disappears at the end of rainy season in tropical areas and at the time of the first frosts in temperate zone (Sarkar et al., 2020) [9].
Impact of climate change on epidemiology of animal diseases
Diseases that were previously limited only to tropical areas are now spreading to other previously cooler areas (Lowen et al., 2007). Pathogens that were restricted by seasonal weather patterns can invade new areas and find new susceptible species as the climate warms and/or the winters get milder (IAEA, 2017). The role of environmental pathogen load is perhaps more obvious still in the case of fecal-oral or water-borne transmission. Food poisoning is usually due to fecal contamination of food items. The natural cycle of Avian influenza virus in mallard ducks, it is for a most natural host, involves ingestion of water containing the virus. Natural avian influenza virus replication occurs mainly in the distal end of the enteric duck tract. Virus deposited migratory waterfowl during summer breeding at higher latitudes may be stored in permafrost conditions in sub-arctic regions and survive for centuries (Zhang et al., 2006). Likewise does the anaerobe Bacillus anthrax bacterium survive for decades in the form spores in the soil? Disease agents transmitted by arthropods form a distinct, albeit related category. Indirect transmission of protozoan disease agents may be facilitated by most ticks. Soft ticks feeding on warthogs play a role in the transmission of African Swine Fever (ASF) (Kleiboeker and Scoles, 2001) [10].
The causative agent of ASF, a DNA virus, may survive for eight years in the tick vector. Some insect-borne diseases can survive in dormant form. For example, rift valley fever (RVF) virus may survive in mosquito eggs for years, until a prolonged heavy rain fall facilitates the making of Aedes mosquitoes, feeding on ruminants, and thus kick-starting an RVF outbreak. Infected ruminants that end up in densely populated irrigation schemes may also attract mosquitoes feeding on humans and thus contribute to the transmission of RVF among humans. Midges are sometimes blown by wind across wider geographic areas. These will probably what happened with bluetongue virus introduction in the United Kingdom, in the summer of 2006, after the virus had first spread west wards across Belgium (Gloster et al., 2008). It was observed that flare up of the schmallelgberg virus in the United Kingdom in early 2012 resulted from wind carried infected midges arriving from mainland Europe (Gibbens, 2008). (Figure 2)
In the direct-indirect transmission spectrum, directly, swiftly transmitted common flu, short lived fevers, fecal-oral, food and vector-borne transmission to more prominent free living parasite stage can be noted. In this regard ectoparasite and myiasis causing insects may be considered. Arthropod pests are strongly modulated by climatic and weather conditions. The effect of climate change on the tsetse flies, the vector of human and animal trypanosomiasis, is rather different, deposit certain similarities between tsetse and the screwworm fly life history, the effects of climate change on disease distribution may take many different forms, compression, and generalization. the tsetse fly distribution in Ethiopia entails a gradual encroachment of the country’s central high and plateau, recorded since the 1960s, the old-world screwworm fly colonized the Arabian Peninsula, first the Mesopotamia valley in Iraq and later parts of Yemen, the course two decades (Siddig et al., 2005) [11].
Effects of climate change on emergence and spread of animal diseases - As global temperature increases, the effects will be quite complex and vary from region to region. Though the extent of these effects is uncertain, it is known that those communities and regions with the least resources, such as rural agricultural areas will be the most vulnerable to climate change (Steinfeld et al., 2006) [12].
![Click here to view Large Figure 2](images/JDVS.MS.ID.555938.G002.png)
Warmer and wetter (particularly warmer winters) will increase the risk and occurrence of animal diseases, as certain species that serve as disease vectors, such as biting flies and ticks, are more likely to survive year-round. Certain existing parasitic diseases may also become more prevalent, or their geographical range may spread, if rainfall increases. This may contribute to an increase in disease spread, including zoonotic diseases (Epstein et al., 2005). Transportation of animals for personal, entertainment, or agricultural purposes also increases the possibility for the introduction and subsequent presence of diseases and pests, including ticks and parasites, previously considered exotic. The viral infection bluetongue disease, for example, was once only a threat in Africa, now affects cattle and sheep in the whole of Europe (IPCC, 2007).
The relationship between climate change and the animal disease shown by the arrow labeled 1 in figure to describe their relation. The climate change responses are broadly consistent with other works that have highlighted the increase in the incidence of vector borne diseases in association with climate change. This increase is due to both the markedly altered vector population size and dynamics, and the increases in pathogen replication rates that are influenced directly by ambient temperatures during infection of the poikilothermic arthropod vectors (Relman et al., 2008) [13].
Impact of climate change on vectors of animal diseases- One consequence of significant and permanent changes to our climate is the alteration of disease patterns in humans and animals. These alterations may include the emergence of new disease syndromes and a change in the prevalence of existing diseases, particularly those spread by biting insects (Purse et al., 2005). Climate change may cause vector-borne diseases to shift in distribution because the vectors’ ecology and the pathogen development rate within them strongly depend on environmental conditions. In some cases, shifts to previously unexposed populations of humans and animals could have severe or even devastating consequences (Helene et al., 2011). Vectors may reach out to wider geographical areas widening their distribution patterns to non-immune areas and may recruit new vectors or new strains resulting in the spread to new hosts (Purse et al., 2005) [14].
The overall sero-prevalence rate of 22.34% reported in this study agreed with the previous finding from Ethiopia [16] in which sero-positivity of 26.5% was reported. Compared to the present findings lower prevalences of 5.6% [17], 8.01% [18] and 9% [19] were reported from Afar Regional State, Dire Dawa and western Ethiopia, respectively. On the other hand, relatively higher seroprevalence was previously reported in samples from the Eastern zone of Tigray with 41.5%; followed by the Guji zone of Oromia and Yeka district of Addis Ababa city, with 32.7% and 30% respectively [20]. [21] in Sudan, [22], in Saudi Arabia and Uganda also reported sero-prevalences of 16%, 53% and 77% respectively, from FMD virus infected cattle. The observed prevalence variation may be resulted from differences in individual animals breed, age, and sex and production system.
Insect-borne diseases are now present in temperate areas where the vector insects were nonexistent in the past e.g. trypanosomiasis, anaplasmosis. Vector borne diseases are particularly affected by weather patterns and long-term climatic factors strongly influence the incidence of outbreaks. Most of these diseases are caused by insects and their population dynamics are dependent on the prevailing weather conditions, specifically temperature and humidity. It is now evident that diseases carried by insects and ticks are likely to be affected by environmental changes because these creatures are themselves very sensitive to vegetation type, temperature, humidity etc (IAEA, 2017). Predictions indicate that climate change will result in warmer temperatures and increased humidity which in turn will affect vegetation quality. These changes can influence arthropod patterns of all changes associated to climate. Warmer temperatures result in increasing vital titer within vectors as well as vectors survival from season to season and increase in biting frequency. Therefore, increases in temperature can result in changes in the number of vector generations and overall abundance of insect populations which in turn can influence vector population dynamics and increase transmission (De La et al., 2008). Because arthropods are highly sensitive to environmental and seasonal temperatures, the range of vector-borne diseases such as bluetongue, west Nile fever, Venezuelan equine encephalitis, rift valley fever, African horse sickness and visceral leishmaniasis may be limited by the distribution of competent vectors. For instance, the expansion of the geographical range of Anopheles vectors and the lack of wellstructured and financed public health systems could explain the re- emergence of malaria and dengue in South America, central Africa, and Asia. Similarly, some species biting midges known to be vectors for African horse sickness (AHS) and bluetongue have recently invaded Europe and North Africa (Purse et al., 2005) [15].
There is a global trend for mosquitoes and biting midges to populate and establish themselves in new ecosystems. Although there are several historical records of bluetongue outbreaks in Europe, the recurrent exotic introductions since 1998 have been alarming, with six strains of bluetongue virus identified across 12 countries and occurring some 80km further north than ever previously reported. This rapid spread has been driven by climate change, which has increased virus persistence in vector hosts during winter period and the North ward expansion of culicoides imicola, an indigenous European midge species, thereby expanding the risk of transmission over larger geographical regions. In addition, animal parasites, including tick- borne diseases in Africa and New world screwworm (CochlioAbraraa00000hominivorax) in south America, have spread to new regions, causing negative impact on livestock production, and causing direct or indirect effects on public health (Rappole et al., 2000) [16].
Understanding vector capacity is key to understanding diseases dynamics. Many significant livestock diseases have insects (mosquitoes or ticks) as part of their transmission cycle. Bluetongue disease in cattle, ASF in pigs and Rift valley fever in ruminants are just a few diseases named. In humans’ malaria is the most significant. Rainfall patterns may also have a clear impact on the life cycle of pathogens and diseases. The expected accumulation of water can result in nesting sites for mosquitoes to breed and expand, and as a result serve as reservoirs and transmitters for diseases. Besides changes in rainfall patterns, climate change can result in increased frequency of sever climatic event which can result in an important feature of vector distribution (Abedin et al., 2020) [17].
Impact of Climate Change on Wildlife Health
The inter-governmental panel on climate change projects that unprecedented rate of climate changes will result in increasing average global temperatures, rising sea levels, changing global precipitation patterns including increasing amounts and variability, and increasing mid continental summer drought. Increasing temperatures, combined with changes in rainfall and humidity, may have significant impacts on wildlife, domestic animals and human health and diseases. When combined with expanding human populations, these changes could increase demand on limited water resources, lead to more habitat destruction and provide yet more opportunities for infectious diseases to cross from one species to another (IPCC, 2007).
Climate change, habitat destruction and urbanization, the introduction exotic and invasive species and population- all affect eco-system and human health. Climate change can also be viewed within the context of other physical and climatic cycles, such as El Nino Southern oscillation (El Nino), the North Atlantic oscillation, and cycles in solar radiation that have profound effects on the earth’s climate. The effects of climate change on wildlife disease can be summarized in terms of geographic range and distribution of wildlife diseases, plant and animal phenology, and patterns of wildlife diseases, community and eco-system composition, and habitat degradation (Walter et al., 2002) [18].
Impact on geographic range and distribution of wildlife diseases - In the Northern Hemisphere, global warming has likely played a role in geographic shifts of disease vectors and parasitic diseases that have life cycles. For example, the black legged tick carries and transmits Lyme disease and several other tick-borne zootomic diseases in North America that has been expanding North into Southern Ontario and Western Ontario and Manitoba, and more recently, into Quebec and Canada Maritime Province (Ogden et al., 2010). In Europe, a similar North ward expansion of the European Castor bean tick, which also carries and transmits Lyme diseases, tick borne encephalitis (TBE), and other diseases, has been reported in Norway (Hasle, 2009) and Sweden. On both continents migrating birds carrying feeding ticks are likely the source of long-range expansion of the tick vectors and increasing environmental temperatures have likely permitted the tick to become established in larger geographic areas (Lindgren, 2000). Scientists also expected changes in disease distribution to occur in association with changes in latitude. For example, climate warming was reported to lead to year-round transmission of mosquito borne avian malaria at higher elevations in the Hawaiian Island, further threatening enlarged native Hawaiian birds that have little or no resistance to introduced diseases. Currently on the Island of Hawaii avian malaria is limited to warmer elevations. If the higher elevations become warmer as projected, mosquito activity and parasitic development in these areas will increase. Conservationists are concerned that climate change may lead to increased avian malaria transmission throughout the year at increasing higher elevations (Nas et al., 2020) [19].
Phenologic effects of climate change on wildlife diseases
Timing of recurring seasonal biologic cycles of some plants and animal species has already been affected by climate change (Walter et al., 2010). The timing of biological cycles, such as the arrival of a bird species in spring and the availability of its preferred food source, is critical for successful breeding and survival. Several studies in Europe show that some migratory birds have changed their migration patterns in response to climate change by arriving earlier than records show historically (Lehikoinen et al., 2004; Thorup et al., 2007). Significant population declines were reported recently for bird species that have not responded with earlier arrival, and the population declines have been interpreted as indicating the magnitude, and negative effect, in miss match between bird arrival time and the onset of plants emerging from dormancy in spring (Saino et al., 2011). Variability in the timing of biological cycles also can lead to an increase or decrease in the risk for infectious diseases, particularly diseases transmitted by mosquitoes or ticks. In Europe, it was reported that transmission of TBE to humans to be increased during warmer temperatures in the early spring resulting in the overlap of feeding activity of virus infected nymphal and uninfected larval European castor bean ticks while Cooler spring temperatures resulting in less likely to pass the virus to feeding larval ticks (Randolph, 2009). In North America, the same seasonal temperature effect has been observed in the transmission of the bacterium Borella burgdorferi, cause of Lyme disease, from infected nymphal black legged ticks to uninfected larval ticks. Climate change by altering seasonal weather patterns has the potential to affect these natural cycles (Gatewood et al., 2009) [20].
Climate Change and Animal Production
Animal production and climate change are inter-linked in complex and multi-directional ways (Walter et al., 2010). Livestock agriculture accounts for 35-40% of methane and nearly 70% of nitrous oxide worldwide, gases that rise mainly from the digestive processes of animals, and animal’s waste. Levels will continue to rise as animals’ numbers grow to meet the increasing demands for meat and milk from developing countries. Agricultural emissions of nitrous oxide from manure and the production of artificial fertilizers are projected to increase by 35-60% by 2030. Some developing regions will have very large increases, including parts of East Asia with an increase of 35% from enteric fermentation and 86% for manure management.
Deforestation for animal production accounts for 85.5% of all carbon oxide life stock related emissions and 34% of Carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide emissions. The increased production of beef in South America and Soybean production for feed transported to Europe is leading to deforestation of the rain forest, which has a great impact on the emission of GHG. Soybean production for feed also causes losses of biodiversity and chemical population (Smeraldi, 2008). On the other hand, animals are intrinsically dependent on the environment, and any fluctuation in weather and climate can affect them through water scarcity, environmental changes such as desertification, and feed and water availability, access, and appropriateness (Rafiquzzaman, 2020). Climate change will not only impact the health and welfare of animals, but also the more than a billion people who depend on them. Desertification and climate change are inextricably linked through feed backs between land degradation and precipitation. Less rain leads to soil compaction and hardening, making the land able to absorb rainwater. These could have disastrous effects as rain becomes less frequent but heavier. The increased use of chemical-based agricultural inputs, including artificial fertilizers, pesticides, and herbicides, and their impacts on soil and water quality will likely exacerbate the effects of climate change by further degrading other ecosystems, such as Coral reefs and rivers, decreasing the land’s ability to produce food (Uddin et al., 2017). It is much easier for farmers in developed countries to endure a climatic set back than those in poorer nations, where 80% of the popular lives in rural areas and approximately 40% of the economy is supported by rain agriculture (united Nation population Division, 2006). For example, as grazing areas dry up in sub- sheep, and wildlife dependent on access to grazing areas for food will suffer. This will lead to greater conflict between people and animals (Menin, 2007) [21].
The Links between Animal Production and Climate Change
The links between animal production and climate change are complex and multi-directional (Walter et al., 2010) can be viewed in terms of: (i) Contribution of animal production to climate change and (ii) impact of climate change on livestock production [22].
Contribution of animal production to climate change
According to IPCC (2007) report, the agriculture sector contributed between 10% and 12% of global emission of GHG, in terms of carbon dioxide equivalent. It contributed 40% of the total of anthropic emissions of methane (from enteric fermentation, decomposition of manure flooded rice fields) and 65% of the total of anthropic nitrous oxide (agricultural land use of nitrogenous fertilizers, spreading manure and burning biomass). In the mentioned 2006 report, applying life cycle analysis methodologies, FAO calculated that 18% of total emission of GHG were attributable, directly, or indirectly contribution from the use of the land for livestock production (mainly deforestation to create pasture and arable land) (Steinfeld et al., 2006). As to the report by OECD, livestock production is seen as being more intensive in terms of emission than other forms of food production or particular concern on the impact of changes in the use of land. The demand for arable land for crop production and pastureland has been the main driver of deforestation in certain developing countries. But at the same time, livestock production is vital for millions of people as the source of food, the generation cobenefits, and a source of income [23].
Impact of climate change on livestock production
In IPCC Third Assessment Report (2007), there was a section devoted that the vulnerability of animal production, warming those animal production facilities will be affected both directly and indirectly by climate change. The direct effects include the interchange of heat between the animal and its environment, associated with the (growth, milk and wool production, reproduction), as well as animal health and welfare. The indirect effects include the influence of climate on the quantity and quality of fodder crops and grains, and severity and distribution of diseases and parasites (Islam et al., 2020). When the magnitudes (intensity and duration) of adverse climate conditions exceed certain limits, with little or no possibility of recovery, animal functions are adversely affected because of stress, at least in the short term. Genetic variation, the stage in the life cycle and nutritional status also influences their vulnerability and resilience to environmental stress. For example, milk production from dairy cattle and conception rates can fall dramatically, and vulnerable animals may die because of extreme events (IPCC, 2007).
Links among Climate Change, Animal Production and Diseases
Climate change influences local weather conditions and therefore has significant impacts on the presence of insects and their geographical distribution and has had an unprecedented worldwide impact on emerging and re-emerging animal diseases and zoonoses (IAEA, 2017); resulting in negative effects on livestock health in many aspects (Nejash and Kula, 2016). Not only climate change, the production system of animals may also have negative impacts on animal diseases. For example, intensifying production systems will increase the opportunity for emerging and re- emerging animal diseases and management systems need to be developed to minimize their direct and indirect effects on production and profitability. This means that in response to actual or anticipated emerging and re-emerging animal diseases, animal production systems will be adjusted or re-developed.
Conclusion and Recommendations
The world’s climate is changing at a faster rate. Even though changes in climate and extreme weather events have received increased attention in recent years; climate change is real and is happening now with concomitant changes in precipitation, flooding, winds, and frequency of extreme events. The average temperature in the world has increased in the last few years compared to the previous century and is expected to continue rising. Climate change can have direct and indirect effects on infectious diseases through disrupting natural ecosystems and providing more suitable environments for infectious diseases allowing disease-causing bacteria, viruses, and fungi to move into new areas where they may harm wildlife and domestic species, as well as humans and it is exacerbating diseases in livestock. The distribution and incidence of vector borne diseases are directly influenced by climate since the geographical distributions of vectors are pre-determined by temperature and humidity. Animal production and climate change are inter-linked in complex and multi-directional ways: i.e. animal production systems can be sources of climate change through releasing gases and deforestation for production of animal feed; while climate change affects animal production through desertification, water scarcity, changes in feed (availability, access, and appropriateness) etc. But both the change in climate and production systems of animals have impacts on diseases of animals; as a result, leading to low productivity of animals, the impact being devastating in developing countries. This suggests that climate change, animal production and animal diseases are closely related and influence each other through different mechanisms.
Based on the current review, the following recommendations are forwarded: Awareness creation, in working in an integrated systematic manner, should be made to the stakeholders in the environmental conservation, animal production and animal health.
Sustainable animal farming and land use, and climate adaptation and mitigation strategies should be developed.
Research with emphasis given to the state of climate change and the direct and indirect effects it poses on animal production and on the occurrence and distribution of animal diseases should be conducted.
References
- Abbass K, Qasim MZ, Song H, Murshed M, Haider M, et (2022) A review of the global climate change impacts, adaptation, and sustainable mitigation measures. Environ Sci Pollut Res (29): 42539-42559.
- Athanasios V (2022) Global Warming and Climate Change. Fossil fuels and anthropogenic activities have warmed the Earth’s atmosphere, oceans, and land. Scientific reviews pp:1-47.
- Jain R, Bhatla AB, Kikani YB, Joshi DG, Patel K (2023) Real Time Cattle Health Monitoring Using IoT, Thing Speak, and a Mobile Application. JEAC 5(1): 1-7.
- Sanchita G, Panja A, Reddy AK, Veldandi A, Siddhesh Z, et al. (2023) Prioritizing Climate Risk Minimization Strategies using Garrett Ranking Method pp:120-136.
- Puneet V, Wanglin M, Hui M, Zhang X (2023) Extreme Weather Events and Credit Demand.
- (2023) Climate change and associated issues.
- Ishan T (2023) the impact of climate changes on the ecology and transmission of vector-borne diseases.
- Karavolias NG, Horner W, Abugu MN, Evanega S, (2021)Application of Gene Editing for Climate Change in Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems (5):1-23.
- Cory T, Casazza ML (2023) Movement behavior habitat selection, and functional responses to habitat availability among four species of wintering water fowl in California. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 11: 1-15.
- Kiragu C (2023) the Impact of Climate Change on Animal Health and Disease Patterns. Journal of Animal Health.
- IyekeA, IkeojiCN, AgbidiSS (2021) Challenges Faced by Grass-cutter Farmers in Delta State: Implications for Teaching Animal Husbandry in Secondary Schools. JRME 11(6): 25-32.
- Xing L, Wang S (2023) Can industrial agglomeration affect biodiversity loss? Energy &Environment.
- Saldana DH, Suarez LA, Wahinya P, Bunter KL (2023) Identification of climate-resilient merino sheep using satellite images.
- Samuel M, Swingler K, Brulisauer F, Anthony H, GeorgeG, et al. (2023) Text mining of veterinary forums for epidemiological surveillance supplementation. Soc Netw Anal Min 13:121.
- Dhyani S, Adhikari D, Dasgupta R, Kadaverugu R (2023) Ecosystem and Species Habitat Modeling for Conservation and Restoration.
- Nunes LJR (2023)The Rising Threat of Atmospheric CO2: A Review on the Causes, Impacts, and Mitigation Environments 10(4):66.
- Fallah SN, Mohabbati KN, Alavi S, Zahed MA(2022)Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) as a Frameworkfor Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). Sustainability14(3): 1222.
- (2023) Sustainable Lifestyles. UN Environment
- Octavio LP, Zaldívar LJE, Zumbado M, Travieso AM (2023) The Role of Veterinariansin Managing Community Cats: A Contextualized, Comprehensive Approach for Biodiversity, Public Health, and Animal Welfare. Animals 13(10): 1586.
- Lacetera N (2018) Impact of climate change on animal health and welfare.Anim Front 9 (1):26-31.
- Yinglin W, Ling X, Huang SL, Ping L, Zengwei Y, et public awareness Management 153: 76-83.
- (2023) One Health. Geneva Environment Network.